President Lyndon B. Johnson signs the
Immigration Act of 1965 at the foot of the Statue of Liberty on October 3,
1965. Photo Credit: Yoichi Okamoto/LBJ Library
Fifty years ago, Congress passed the Immigration and
Nationality Act of 1965 which President Lyndon B. Johnson signed on October 3,
1965 at the base of the Statue of Liberty. Though at the time, Johnson stated
the act was “not
a revolutionary bill,” hindsight has proven otherwise. The 1965
act marked a significant shift in U.S. immigration policy away from selecting
immigrants by national origin and has had a lasting impact in shaping America today
as a richly diverse nation.
Why
is this act important to know about?
Before 1965, immigrants to the U.S. largely came from
Northern European countries based on numerical limits first enacted in the 1920s.
In fact, just
prior to the law’s passage, Ireland, Germany, and the United Kingdom received
nearly 70% of the quota visas available to enter the U.S.
After the bill passed, the demographics of the U.S. shifted as the U.S.
implemented an immigration policy that favored family reunification, skilled
immigrants, and the elimination of the race-based quota system. As a result,
immigrants from other parts of the world – notably Latin America and Asia –
began to come to the U.S.
According to a recent report released by Pew
Research, “among immigrants who have arrived since 1965, half
(51%) are from Latin America and one-quarter are from Asia.” The report further
shows that without the 1965 act, our nation would be incredibly less diverse
today. Comparatively, U.S. ethnic and racial composition would be: 75% white,
14% black, 8% Hispanic and less than 1% Asian. We’d also be slightly older
without the arrival of so many immigrants.
What
prompted such a significant change?
Scholars often cite the social
reforms of the civil rights movement as well as World War II and
Cold War era national security concerns as reasons that prompted this
significant immigration reform. The Migration
Policy Institute (MPI) notes that “the Allies in World War II
and the West during the Cold War risked losing support from Third World
countries whose peoples were excluded by openly racist immigration laws.” More
recent scholarship by Thomas Gjelten in his book Nation of Nations: A Great American
Immigration Story offers an in-depth account
of the congressional process, specifically the emphasis on family
reunification, and the act’s unintended consequences.
What
does this mean for the future?
Pew Research also projected immigration trends fifty
years from now. By 2065, no
racial or ethnic group will constitute a majority of the U.S. population. We will increasingly become more diverse with
a growing multiracial population. Notably, the share of the foreign born
Hispanic population is estimated to fall to 31% while the share of Asian
immigrants will rise to 38%.
What
does this mean for the classroom?
By 2050, one
in three children under the age of 18 will be either an immigrant
or the child of an immigrant. As the U.S. immigrant student population
grows, the need to cultivate positive, diverse classrooms and libraries, ones that are reflective of all students
and various immigration experiences is ever more prescient. Important also,
will be the need to actively weed out hate from the immigration debate , welcome immigrant students into the
classroom, and value how immigrant students strengthen American
schools.
|
Additional Resources
We offer many
resources including lesson plans and grants to teach about immigration past and
present, but we are especially pleased this week to release a short lesson created
by ESL and Human Rights teacher at Newcomers High School, Julie Mann. “Lessons
on Acceptance and Forgiveness: A Tale of Two Americas” focuses on changing
negative perceptions of immigrants based on the story of Rais Bhuiyan and the Ted Talk by Anand Giridharadas, “A Tale of Two Americas.” The lesson is appropriate
for high school students and adaptable for many reading levels.
No comments:
Post a Comment